Determining your left from right: an explanation of left and right wing

Thursday 18th March 2010
Thursday 18th March 2010
Right wing protester.jpg

“Left-wing politicians say no to motorway.”

“Right-wing party faces defeat at the polls.”

Every day the news headlines use the phrases left wing and right wing in relation to politics.

But how many of us actually know (or can easily define) what these terms mean, particularly when most of today’s mainstream political parties seem to be occupying the same middle ground.

The use of left and right wing to describe differing schools of political thought dates back to the time of the French Revolution and the seating arrangements of the French National Assembly.

The commoners, who were known to be more radically in favour of change sat on the left. Sitting on the right were those with ties to the upper class and the church, and were more inclined to maintain the status quo.

Given that the French king eventually went to the guillotine, it would seem they were all pretty much in favour of revolution.

However, the idea that the right is aligned with conservatism and the left with liberalism caught on and has remained with us for the last 200 years.

So how are left wing and right wing different from one another? Let’s paint a broad picture.

Left wingers take the view that government should be working towards a society where everyone has equal opportunities.

The government should provide free healthcare and education, and there should be social welfare available for the less fortunate.

Taxation needs to be high to pay for this, and ideally certain businesses should be kept under government ownership so the profits can be used to help run the country.

Left wingers tend to be liberal on social issues. They’re pro gay marriage and abortion and also have strong views on conservation and saving the environment.

In contrast, right wingers take the view that the government should step back and let individuals stand or fall on their own.

Taxes should be lower, and healthcare, education and social welfare should primarily be the responsibility of the individual, not the government.

There should be no government ownership of businesses and the free market should reign, with profit giving business owners the incentive to perform and provide better products.

Right wingers are conservative on social issues. They’re anti gay marriage and abortion and feel that business should trump the environment, particularly when it relates to oil exploration or the mining of valuable commodities.

That’s the theoretical view. In reality, there’s a spectrum of beliefs running all the way from hard left political systems like Communism to the Fascists of the extreme right.

Most people and political parties sit somewhere in the middle.

This has led to the development of the terms centre-left and centre-right to describe this middle ground.

While many of today’s political parties have historically had strong ties to either right or left wing philosophies, as time has passed, these views have become more moderate as they’ve sought to appeal more to voters.

The centrist model sees politicians today choosing policies from both sides of the equation, whichever is likely to play best in the electorate.

Britain’s Labour Party is a good example of this. Formerly the party of trade unionists and workers, in the 1990s under the leadership of Tony Blair they repositioned themselves as ‘New Labour’ and became the darlings of the British middle (and even upper) classes.

There are also cases of supposedly left or right wing parties executing some amazing right turns (or left turns) once in government.

For instance, after gaining power in the mid 1980s, the left wing New Zealand Labour Party instituted a hard core right wing economic strategy (known as Rogernomics), leading to accusations that the party had betrayed its socialist roots.

Ultimately though, the terms left wing and right wing encompass a wide range of political value systems – especially when comparing different countries.

Indeed, they are really just a handy guide, and not a guaranteed indicator of how a politician or political party will act.

By Jo Blick

See other articles on:

Nice Jo -- Would also add,

Nice Jo --

Would also add, for your readers, that the extremities of each philosophy, in practice, cross-over and inevitably cause a very similar outcome - social failure.

Examining the extremities, you get straight to the core of the differences between "left wing" and "right wing" philosophies.

Right Wing: Fascism:
Fascism is where the state takes total power over citizens, in order to achieve "efficiency" or "productivity" for the "national good". You can think of fascism like "everyone joins the army". The government controls the economy, so it can allocate all resources "in the national interest"; which is defined as "strong" or "powerful".

Left Wing Extremism: Communism:
The state takes away individual's rights (to own property, or to capture personal benefit from industry, etc) in order to ensure "fairness" or "equality". The famous catch phrase is "from each according to [their] ability, To each according to [their] need". Individuals' rights are likewise diminished "for the greater good"; and leaders gain power and can hardly help becoming "more equal than others", in the name of whatsoever 'national good' they can construct.

In this way - left wing, and right wing, believe that some sector of society would be better off being more like the other parts.

For Left wingers, the rich/establishment can be undone, and their wealth redistributed. However, this creates diseconomies of scale, and often stagnation, favouritism, etc.

For Right Wingers, the "poor" could be put to better use.. and low taxes, user-pays systems are the best way to encourage industry, work, and the comparative social/economic rewards that "work" is seen to bring.

So to summarise, when a person claims to be "a little bit left" - they are identifying themselves [just a little bit] with the extreme belief that all people should be economically equal; and that this can be achieved by removing the rights of the wealthy, to 'redistribute' wealth (which is sometimes seen as punishing people who inherited, have become, or want to be wealthy).

Those who are "a little bit right" identify with the idea that "not all people are contributing their fair share" and should be "put to work". The believe less in "welfare for doing nothing" and that each person is capable of producing effort, or outcome, and not to do so is a personal choice. Therefore, for the good of the nation, 'control' should be taken, where necessary, of the "unwashed masses" and they should be 'put to good use'. in this way, you can summarise: "From each according to their ability, to each according to their use".

Both are dangerous. Communism, generally weakens a country economically, and it's citizens emigrate, stagnate, or profligate. Fascism takes away the powers of the weak; it does not protect the invalid, or the genuinely unfortunate. Fortunately, both systems appear to believe in Education - commonly agreed to be of benefit (these days).

Additionally, the Comparison of "Capitalism vs. Communism" is often a false one.

Communism is a distribution system, and is probably more properly compared to the right wing equivalent of Imperialism.

Capitalism is a system of "reward for effort" - and is more like a set of rules used by both Imperialism and Communism to generate and motivate citizens within each political system. As "reward for effort" is perverted (either by paying unfairly low wages, or unfairly high wages) then the effectiveness and stability of the system implementing the 'distortion' is diminished.

:o)

Comment

Wow, that's like another whole article.

Excellent, I always

Excellent, I always struggled with the differences!

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.

Sign Up to Our Daily Email

Daily Token

Home | About Us | Contact Us | Submit an Idea or Story | AdvertiseTerms of Use | Privacy Policy - Copyright 2009